Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than Sony Xperia X Compact, having a score of 88.5 against 71.8. Although Galaxy Z Flip is notably heavier than Sony Xperia X Compact, it's way thinner and much newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a quite better processing power than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has more RAM memory and 2 more CPU cores.
Galaxy Z Flip features a sharper display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a much bigger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better camera than Xperia X Compact, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip features much more memory to install applications and games than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip counts with better battery performance than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.