Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than Xperia X Compact's global score of 71.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is notably newer and a lot thinner than Xperia X Compact's, although it's extremely heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little more vivid screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has a way bigger display, a way better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a bit better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a greater processing power than Xperia X Compact, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures clearer pictures and videos than Xperia X Compact, because although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia X Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.