Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is way better than Sony Xperia X Compact's global score of 71.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner than the Sony Xperia X Compact's, although it's notably heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a greater performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has 9 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a way larger display, a little bit greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1768 x 2208px resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has much more storage for games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a 4400mAh battery size. Xperia X Compact counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.