Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2021-05-06 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a lot better than Xperia X Compact, with an 88.3 score against 71.8. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a notably newer device than Xperia X Compact, although it's just a bit thicker and incredibly heavier. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a better performing processor than Xperia X Compact, because it has a higher number of cores and 5 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a way better looking screen than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bit better pixel density and a really larger display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a superior camera than Xperia X Compact, because it has a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a better storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a very superior battery duration than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.