Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| 2016-09-08 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than Sony Xperia X Compact, with a overall score of 83.8 against 71.8. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Sony Xperia X Compact, but it's extremely heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better CPU than Xperia X Compact, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little bit better screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a lot higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a lot larger display. Xperia X Compact features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xperia X Compact also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs, a back facing camera with a lot higher 23 mega-pixels resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia X Compact, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has better battery performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 26% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.