Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is better than Xperia X Compact, getting an 82.4 score against 71.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's body is incredibly newer and thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Xperia X Compact. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a larger number of cores and 3 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much better looking display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a just a bit better screen pixel density and a lot bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a way better camera than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a camera with way more MP, a larger diafragm aperture and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X Compact, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a superior battery duration than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.