Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than Xperia X Compact, getting a overall score of 81.1 against 71.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but heavier than Xperia X Compact. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a really bigger screen and a little greater pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia X Compact, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Xperia X Compact, because it has a larger aperture, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot more mega pixels camera and a way higher (4K) video definition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xperia X Compact, because it has an 86 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.