Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-06-23 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than the Xperia X Performance, with an 85.3 score against 72.3. Although the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is incredibly heavier than the Xperia X Performance, it's just a little thinner and much newer. IPhone 11 Pro Max has a better display than Xperia X Performance, because it has a larger screen, a better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a just a bit greater screen density.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a better processing power than Xperia X Performance, because it has 1 GB more RAM, 2 more CPU cores and a 64-bit CPU. The Xperia X Performance has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 200 GB.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a much better camera than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a way less MP back-facing camera and a smaller back camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos.
IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 47% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.