Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2016-06-23 | 2015-09-09 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 4.64 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s has an overall score of 83, which is better than the Xperia X Performance's score of 72.3. Apple iPhone 6s's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than Xperia X Performance, although it was released about 10 months before. The Apple iPhone 6s has a little more vivid screen than Xperia X Performance, although it has a lot worse 1334 x 750 pixels resolution, a little smaller screen and a much worse screen density.
IPhone 6s counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The iPhone 6s features a better hardware performance than Xperia X Performance, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone 6s has a bit better camera than Xperia X Performance, although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels, a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations and a lot smaller sensor taking way lower quality videos and pictures.
The Sony Xperia X Performance has a superior battery life than iPhone 6s, because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity instead of 1715mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.