Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| 2016-06-23 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Sony Xperia X Performance's general score of 72.3. Even though the iPhone X is just a bit heavier than the Sony Xperia X Performance, it's thinner and also newer. The iPhone X counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xperia X Performance, because it has a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a larger display and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
IPhone X counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The iPhone X counts with a quite better performance than Xperia X Performance, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone X also has a larger number of cores and a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit superior battery performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has 2716mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. The Apple iPhone X captures better photos and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a way worse image quality and a back facing camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.