Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| 2016-06-23 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is better than the Xperia X Performance's 72.3 overall score. IPhone XR's construction is notably newer and a bit thinner than the Xperia X Performance's, but it is also heavier. Apple iPhone XR features a display that's very similar to the Xperia X Performance one, because although the Apple iPhone XR has a bit worse 828 x 1792 pixels resolution and a much worse number of pixels in each inch of display, it also counts with a larger display.
Apple iPhone XR has a superior processing power than Xperia X Performance, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XR also has a 64-bits processor and a higher number of cores. Xperia X Performance counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 200 GB.
The iPhone XR captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality and a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture. IPhone XR has a bit longer battery life than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 9 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.