Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-06-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is much better than the Xperia X Performance's score of 72.3. The Google Pixel 3 construction is notably newer, lighter and a bit thinner than the Xperia X Performance. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. Sony Xperia X Performance counts with a better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 200 GB.
Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better battery duration than Xperia X Performance, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a back-facing camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.