Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-06-23 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than the Sony Xperia X Performance, with a general score of 82.9 against 72.3. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is somewhat heavier than Sony Xperia X Performance, it's just a little thinner and also notably newer. The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better screen than Xperia X Performance, because it has a much better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a little bit better pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a bigger display.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better CPU than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM memory. Xperia X Performance counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 200 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better camera than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution and a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light environments.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.