Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is better than the Sony Xperia X Performance, having a general score of 82.9 against 72.3. The Google Pixel 4a is a way newer device, and it's also just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Sony Xperia X Performance. The Google Pixel 4a has just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit more vivid display than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a larger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Google Pixel 4a features more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 4a features greater battery performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 16% more battery size. The Google Pixel 4a shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality and a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.