Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is a lot better than the Xperia X Performance's global score of 72.3. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit heavier than Xperia X Performance, it's a bit thinner and also newer. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processing unit than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a display that's very similar to Xperia X Performance's display, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a better camera than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and images, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better battery life than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 3885mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.