Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Sony Xperia X Performance, having an 89 score against 72.3. Google Pixel 5's body is newer, just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Sony Xperia X Performance. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit faster processor than Xperia X Performance, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a screen that's very similar to Sony Xperia X Performance's screen, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a quite worse pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X Performance, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 5 features a superior battery performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 4080mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh. The Google Pixel 5 has a better camera than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a worse image and video quality and a lot less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.