Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a lot better than the Sony Xperia X Performance's global score of 72.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a heavier cellphone than Sony Xperia X Performance, but both are equally thin. The Xperia X Performance has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster).
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better screen than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a little bit lower pixels amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a really bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia X Performance, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better camera than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a way more mega-pixels back camera, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.