Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is much better than the Sony Xperia X Performance, having a general score of 81.5 against 72.3. Moto G 5G's body is newer, but thicker and much heavier than Sony Xperia X Performance. Moto G 5G has a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a larger number of cores and 1 GB more RAM.
Xperia X Performance counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch in the screen. Moto G 5G captures greater photographs and videos than Xperia X Performance, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Moto G 5G has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior battery life than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.