Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the Sony Xperia X Performance, with a general score of 86.2 against 72.3. The Moto G200 5G construction is extremely newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Sony Xperia X Performance. The Sony Xperia X Performance features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit better CPU than Xperia X Performance, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G200 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments and a back camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Moto G200 5G has a better storage capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.