Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-06-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the Xperia X Performance's score of 72.3. The Moto Z Force design is thinner and a little lighter than the Xperia X Performance, even though both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit better display than Xperia X Performance, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Moto Z Force features a bit better performance than Xperia X Performance, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto Z Force also has 1 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z Force has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The Moto Z Force has longer battery lifetime than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 3500mAh battery size. The Moto Z Force has a better camera than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.