Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is way better than Xperia X Performance's 72.3 overall score. The Motorola razr (2020) body is incredibly newer and a little thinner than Xperia X Performance's, although it is also heavier. The Xperia X Performance has a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel amount in each screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better performance than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots way better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a bigger camera sensor and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit superior battery performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.