Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than the Xperia X Performance's overall score of 72.3. Although Galaxy A35 5G is a lot heavier than the Xperia X Performance, it's just a bit thinner and a lot newer. The Xperia X Performance features a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory.
Galaxy A35 5G has a bit sharper display than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a really larger display. The Galaxy A35 5G features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia X Performance, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia X Performance, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. Galaxy A35 5G takes much better videos and photos than Xperia X Performance, because it has a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.