Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Xperia X Performance's 72.3 general score. The Galaxy A51 5G construction has the same thickness than Xperia X Performance, but it is heavier. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xperia X Performance, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and more CPU cores.
The Xperia X Performance features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia X Performance, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a 67% more battery size. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a lot better camera than Xperia X Performance, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.