Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2016-06-23 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a lot better than Xperia X Performance, having a 90.7 score against 72.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is newer and a bit thinner than the Xperia X Performance's, although it's heavier. The Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xperia X Performance, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
The Sony Xperia X Performance has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a much smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. The Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A52 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Xperia X Performance, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a really longer battery life than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.