Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-23 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia X Performance's score of 72.3. Galaxy A70's design is extremely newer and a bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than Sony Xperia X Performance. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit better CPU than Xperia X Performance, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores (although they are slower).
Sony Xperia X Performance has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. The Galaxy A70 counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X Performance, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery duration than Xperia X Performance, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. The Sony Xperia X Performance shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a larger sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.