Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is a lot better than Xperia X Performance's general score of 72.3. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is way newer and just a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Xperia X Performance. Sony Xperia X Performance counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little better performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better camera than Xperia X Performance, because it has a much larger camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xperia X Performance, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.