Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than the Xperia X Performance, getting a general score of 77.7 against 72.3. Samsung Galaxy Note3's design is just a little thinner than the Xperia X Performance, but it is a little bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Sony Xperia X Performance. They have the same RAM amount and a Quad-Core processor.
The Sony Xperia X Performance counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 1920px, the Sony Xperia X Performance also counts with a bit higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a bit better camera than Sony Xperia X Performance, although it has a way smaller camera sensor capturing much lower quality photographs and videos, a tinier camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB against 200 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note3 has improved battery lifetime than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.