Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-23 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is much better than the Xperia X Performance's 72.3 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a extremely thinner and noticeably lighter phone than the Xperia X Performance. Sony Xperia X Performance has a way better processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 less processing cores.
Galaxy S25 has a sharper screen than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia X Performance, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh. Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than Xperia X Performance, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.