Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is much better than Xperia X Performance's score of 72.3. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than Xperia X Performance. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little faster processor than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Xperia X Performance has just a bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little better display pixels density. Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better camera than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor providing a much lower image quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a higher resolution camera. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.