Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Xperia X Performance, with a score of 92.3 against 72.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is a lot newer and thinner than the Xperia X Performance's, although it's a bit heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better screen than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a lot larger screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior hardware performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has 5 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots better photos and videos than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor providing a worse image quality and a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior storage for applications and games than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features greater battery duration than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.