Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is much better than the Sony Xperia X Performance, with a global score of 86.6 against 72.3. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 design is much newer than the Sony Xperia X Performance's, although it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little better hardware performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia X Performance has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a way better camera than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera, a much bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a really longer battery duration than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.