Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a little bit better than the Xperia X Performance, getting a score of 76.6 against 72.3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's body is noticeably newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than Xperia X Performance. Xperia X Performance features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a really smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little faster processor than Xperia X Performance, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a higher number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs, a bigger aperture for better low-light images and a back camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a SD card slot that admits up to 128 GB against 200 GB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a superior battery duration than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.