Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-05-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a bit better than Sony Xperia X's global score of 72.9. Google Pixel 3's design is way newer and a bit lighter than Sony Xperia X's, although it's also a bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper display than Xperia X, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
The Xperia X counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 200 GB. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit superior processor than Xperia X, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Sony Xperia X counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Sony Xperia X also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, faster video frame rate and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Google Pixel 3 has a bit longer battery life than Sony Xperia X, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.