Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-05-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than the Xperia X's 72.9 score. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is notably newer than the Xperia X's, but it's a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little more vivid screen than Xperia X, because it has a larger screen, a just a little more pixels per display inch and a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit superior processing unit than Xperia X, because it has 2 more processing cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. The Xperia X counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 200 GB.
Sony Xperia X takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Sony Xperia X also counts with faster video frame rate, a much more MP camera in the back and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Google Pixel 3 XL features better battery life than Sony Xperia X, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 XL is also cheap compared to the Xperia X.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.