Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is much better than Sony Xperia X, having a score of 82.9 against 72.9. Google Pixel 4a is a much newer and just a little lighter device than Sony Xperia X, but it's a little thicker. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia X, because it has more RAM memory and 2 more CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 4a features a bit sharper display than Sony Xperia X, because it has a larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little higher pixel number per inch of display. The Sony Xperia X has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Sony Xperia X also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 4a features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Xperia X, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4a counts with better battery performance than Sony Xperia X, because it has a 3140mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a is a lot more expensive than the Xperia X, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.