Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Sony Xperia X, having an 87.5 score against 72.9. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is newer than the Sony Xperia X's, although it's just a little thicker and a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit faster processor than Xperia X, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a screen that's very similar to Sony Xperia X's screen, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a quite worse pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a superior battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 3885mAh battery size instead of 2620mAh. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better camera than Xperia X, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a worse image and video quality and a lot less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more than the Xperia X, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.