Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2016-05-23 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is better than the Sony Xperia X's 72.9 global score. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is just a little bit heavier than the Sony Xperia X, it's a bit thinner and also incredibly newer. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xperia X, because it has a bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen, a larger display and a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia X, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Xperia X, because it has 2 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia X has a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xperia X also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates, a way larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a back-facing camera with a way better 23 megapixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has superior battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs more money than Xperia X, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.