Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than the Xperia X, with a overall score of 87.1 against 72.9. The LG Velvet is a noticeably newer phone than Xperia X, but it is heavier and a little thicker. LG Velvet counts with a little faster processing unit than Xperia X, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Xperia X counts with a little sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Xperia X, because it has a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
LG Velvet has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia X, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory. The LG Velvet counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia X, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2620mAh.
The LG Velvet costs more than Sony Xperia X, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.