Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Xperia X's 72.9 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than Xperia X. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Xperia X, because although it has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a really larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage for games and applications than Xperia X, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xperia X counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 2 lesser cores (although they are faster) and 9 GB lesser RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior battery life than Sony Xperia X, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2620mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xperia X, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a bigger aperture for better low-light captures, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.