Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-05-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the Xperia X's 72.9 overall score. Moto Z Force's construction is just a little bit heavier but just a little thinner than Xperia X, and they were released with only a few months difference. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a little more vivid display than Sony Xperia X, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a little better display pixels density.
The Moto Z Force counts with a little faster processing unit than Sony Xperia X, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM. Moto Z Force has a very superior storage for applications and games than Xperia X, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Sony Xperia X has a slightly better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Sony Xperia X also counts with a higher resolution back facing camera and higher video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with superior battery performance than Xperia X, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto Z Force costs more than the Sony Xperia X, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.