Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| 2016-05-23 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 Play is a little bit better than Xperia X, with a 76.3 score against 72.9. Moto Z3 Play's construction is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Xperia X. Sony Xperia X features a little more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
Moto Z3 Play features a bit more powerful processor than Xperia X, because it has more RAM and more processing cores. Xperia X captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xperia X also counts with a camera with a way better resolution, higher video frame rates and a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs.
Moto Z3 Play has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Sony Xperia X, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a little longer battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto Z3 Play is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Sony Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Sony Xperia X. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, otherwise you can save some money and get the Sony Xperia X, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.