Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is much better than the Sony Xperia X's 72.9 overall score. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is a lot newer than the Sony Xperia X, it is a little bit thicker and extremely heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia X, because it has 5 GB more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
Xperia X counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer photos and videos than Xperia X, because it has a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a larger camera aperture for better low light images and video.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Xperia X, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) has a little better battery performance than Sony Xperia X, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia X. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xperia X, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.