Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Meteor grey |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a global score of 80.3, which is much better than the Sony Xperia X's overall score of 72.9. Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is notably newer than Sony Xperia X, it's thicker and extremely heavier. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia X, because it has 2 more cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Xperia X counts with a slightly better looking display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia X, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a very superior battery life than Sony Xperia X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots greater pictures and videos than Xperia X, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much larger sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations and a much more megapixels back camera.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xperia X. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Xperia X, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.