Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is better than the Xperia X, with an 84.6 score against 72.9. The Galaxy A22 5G construction is extremely newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than Xperia X. The Sony Xperia X counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel number per inch in the display.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia X, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia X, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a much longer battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2620mAh. The Galaxy A22 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a bigger aperture and a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.