Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a global score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than the Xperia X's overall score of 72.9. Galaxy A25 5G's design is a lot newer, but just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier than the Xperia X. The Xperia X features a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit sharper display than Xperia X, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Galaxy A25 5G features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia X, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2620mAh. Galaxy A25 5G takes just a bit better videos and photos than Xperia X, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, it also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and videos and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.