Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2016-05-23 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than the Xperia X, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 72.9. The Galaxy A50 construction has the same thickness than Xperia X, but it is just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia X, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Sony Xperia X features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features much more memory for games and applications than Xperia X, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Xperia X and the Samsung Galaxy A50 both have really similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller back camera sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, it also counts with a more megapixels back facing camera and a larger aperture.
Galaxy A50 has a much better battery duration than Xperia X, because it has a 53% larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also cheaper than the other phone, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.