Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2016-05-23 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is way better than the Xperia X's 72.9 global score. The Galaxy A52 design is noticeably newer than Xperia X's, although it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Xperia X has a bit better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia X, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. The Galaxy A52 features just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia X, because it has more RAM and 2 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy A52 has a superior camera than Sony Xperia X, because it has a lot more megapixels back camera, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photographs.
Galaxy A52 features a very superior battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 72% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.