Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than the Xperia X's 72.9 general score. Even though the Galaxy A52 5G is way newer than Xperia X, it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Xperia X counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels number in each inch of display.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia X, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Sony Xperia X, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a better camera than Sony Xperia X, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much higher video definition. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better battery life than Xperia X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2620mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.