Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is a lot better than Xperia X, having a score of 91.1 against 72.9. Even though the Galaxy A52s is much newer than Xperia X, it is just a bit thicker and heavier. The Galaxy A52s features a bit better performance than Xperia X, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
Xperia X has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display. The Galaxy A52s shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Sony Xperia X, because it has a way bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A52s has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a really longer battery life than Xperia X, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.