Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-23 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than Xperia X, with a general score of 76.9 against 72.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy A70 is a lot newer than Xperia X, it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit better performance than Xperia X, because it has 2 more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xperia X counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen. Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia X, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 features a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2620mAh. The Xperia X captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Xperia X also counts with better video frame rates and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xperia X. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xperia X, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.